1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:06,807 2 00:00:06,807 --> 00:00:07,390 PROFESSOR: Hi. 3 00:00:07,390 --> 00:00:08,950 Welcome back to recitation. 4 00:00:08,950 --> 00:00:11,260 We've been talking about antidifferentiation 5 00:00:11,260 --> 00:00:14,980 or integration by substitution and also by a method 6 00:00:14,980 --> 00:00:17,670 that Professor Jerison called "advanced guessing". 7 00:00:17,670 --> 00:00:21,300 So I have a few problems up on the board behind me. 8 00:00:21,300 --> 00:00:23,770 Three antiderivatives for you to compute. 9 00:00:23,770 --> 00:00:29,290 So the first one is e to the 2x times cosine of the quantity 1 10 00:00:29,290 --> 00:00:31,550 minus e to the 2x dx. 11 00:00:31,550 --> 00:00:37,080 The second one is 4x times the quantity 5 x squared minus 1 12 00:00:37,080 --> 00:00:40,240 raised to the 1/3 power. 13 00:00:40,240 --> 00:00:43,040 And the third one is tan of x dx. 14 00:00:43,040 --> 00:00:44,980 So why that you spend a few minutes, 15 00:00:44,980 --> 00:00:47,300 try to compute those antiderivatives yourself, 16 00:00:47,300 --> 00:00:49,140 come back and we can see how you did. 17 00:00:49,140 --> 00:00:57,430 18 00:00:57,430 --> 00:00:59,640 All right, so welcome back. 19 00:00:59,640 --> 00:01:01,470 We have these three antiderivative, 20 00:01:01,470 --> 00:01:03,140 so let's take them in order. 21 00:01:03,140 --> 00:01:08,870 So this first one that I wrote is the antiderivative of e 22 00:01:08,870 --> 00:01:13,250 to the 2x times cosine of the quantity 1 23 00:01:13,250 --> 00:01:17,240 minus e to the 2x dx. 24 00:01:17,240 --> 00:01:21,060 So this problem seems to me like a good candidate 25 00:01:21,060 --> 00:01:22,280 for a substitution. 26 00:01:22,280 --> 00:01:27,100 So we have this clear sort of nested function thing going on. 27 00:01:27,100 --> 00:01:31,360 We have cosine of 1 minus e to the 2x. 28 00:01:31,360 --> 00:01:33,120 And then out front we have something 29 00:01:33,120 --> 00:01:35,840 that looks a lot like the derivative of this 1 minus 30 00:01:35,840 --> 00:01:36,720 e to the 2x. 31 00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:39,080 So I'm going to try this with substitution then. 32 00:01:39,080 --> 00:01:41,510 And I think there are, you know, a few choices 33 00:01:41,510 --> 00:01:43,220 of substitution but a natural one 34 00:01:43,220 --> 00:01:47,540 is to sort of find the most complicated inside piece. 35 00:01:47,540 --> 00:01:50,485 So in this case, that's this whole thing, 1 minus e 36 00:01:50,485 --> 00:01:51,500 to the 2x. 37 00:01:51,500 --> 00:01:53,730 So I'm going to take, for my substitution, 38 00:01:53,730 --> 00:02:01,620 I'm going to take u equals 1 minus e to the 2x. 39 00:02:01,620 --> 00:02:09,570 And so that means du is equal to minus 2 e to the 2x dx. 40 00:02:09,570 --> 00:02:12,090 OK, so that's my substitution. 41 00:02:12,090 --> 00:02:14,860 And when I put my substitution into this integral, 42 00:02:14,860 --> 00:02:15,720 what do I get? 43 00:02:15,720 --> 00:02:20,520 Well, so I have cosine of 1 minus e 44 00:02:20,520 --> 00:02:22,890 to the 2x just becomes cosine of u. 45 00:02:22,890 --> 00:02:26,680 46 00:02:26,680 --> 00:02:32,610 Now e to the 2x dx, that's very, very close to this du here. 47 00:02:32,610 --> 00:02:36,330 So what's different is that here I have a minus 2. 48 00:02:36,330 --> 00:02:43,070 So actually e to the 2x dx is du divided by minus 2. 49 00:02:43,070 --> 00:02:48,890 So this is cosine u times du divided by minus 2. 50 00:02:48,890 --> 00:02:50,920 Now another way to get to this point 51 00:02:50,920 --> 00:02:53,560 is you could solve this equation for dx 52 00:02:53,560 --> 00:02:57,550 and substitute it in and also solve this equation for e 53 00:02:57,550 --> 00:02:59,990 to the 2x and substitute it in and things 54 00:02:59,990 --> 00:03:07,120 should work out more or less the same if you try that out. 55 00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:08,869 So actually you won't even need to make 56 00:03:08,869 --> 00:03:09,910 that second substitution. 57 00:03:09,910 --> 00:03:11,770 You'll just get some nice cancellation there. 58 00:03:11,770 --> 00:03:13,450 It's even simpler than what I just said. 59 00:03:13,450 --> 00:03:15,450 OK, so we do this antiderivative, 60 00:03:15,450 --> 00:03:16,840 we've made this substitution. 61 00:03:16,840 --> 00:03:19,250 So now we have just the antiderivative 62 00:03:19,250 --> 00:03:20,980 of a cosine function. 63 00:03:20,980 --> 00:03:22,480 All right, well that's not that bad. 64 00:03:22,480 --> 00:03:25,540 Because we know that the derivative of sine is cosine. 65 00:03:25,540 --> 00:03:28,450 So the antiderivative of cosine is sine. 66 00:03:28,450 --> 00:03:32,010 So this is equal to-- so that minus 2, that 1 over minus 2 67 00:03:32,010 --> 00:03:34,130 is just going to stick around. 68 00:03:34,130 --> 00:03:40,766 So it's 1 over minus 2 sine of u plus a constant of course, 69 00:03:40,766 --> 00:03:41,890 plus an arbitrary constant. 70 00:03:41,890 --> 00:03:45,170 And OK, and so, but my original function was 71 00:03:45,170 --> 00:03:47,760 in terms of x, so I want to bring everything back 72 00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:48,990 in terms of x. 73 00:03:48,990 --> 00:03:53,460 And so I need to substitute back in, get rid of u 74 00:03:53,460 --> 00:03:54,420 and replace it with x. 75 00:03:54,420 --> 00:03:58,300 So here that's a-- I'll just go back 76 00:03:58,300 --> 00:04:01,600 to what my substitution was and I replace all my u's with it. 77 00:04:01,600 --> 00:04:09,670 So this is minus 1/2 sine the quantity 1 minus 78 00:04:09,670 --> 00:04:15,250 e to the 2x plus a constant. 79 00:04:15,250 --> 00:04:17,750 All right, so this is the antiderivative 80 00:04:17,750 --> 00:04:21,980 of this first expression here. 81 00:04:21,980 --> 00:04:25,120 OK, so now, how about the second one? 82 00:04:25,120 --> 00:04:28,310 So the second one, we could also do it with a substitution. 83 00:04:28,310 --> 00:04:33,570 This is also sort of a prime suspect for advanced guessing. 84 00:04:33,570 --> 00:04:39,097 So we see here that we have some, this polynomial raised 85 00:04:39,097 --> 00:04:39,680 to some power. 86 00:04:39,680 --> 00:04:42,750 So this is 5 x squared minus 1 to the 1/3. 87 00:04:42,750 --> 00:04:46,585 So how can we get from a derivative, something like 5 88 00:04:46,585 --> 00:04:48,890 x squared minus 1 quantity to the 1/3? 89 00:04:48,890 --> 00:04:53,390 Well if you started off with 5 x squared minus 1 to the 4/3 90 00:04:53,390 --> 00:04:57,250 and took a derivative, you would have this 5 x squared minus 1 91 00:04:57,250 --> 00:04:58,500 to the 1/3 coming out. 92 00:04:58,500 --> 00:05:00,750 And you would also have some stuff coming out in front 93 00:05:00,750 --> 00:05:01,620 by the chain rule. 94 00:05:01,620 --> 00:05:02,990 Well what kind of stuff? 95 00:05:02,990 --> 00:05:05,450 Well you know, it would be some derivative 96 00:05:05,450 --> 00:05:08,070 of this quadratic polynomial, which would 97 00:05:08,070 --> 00:05:09,270 be some linear polynomial. 98 00:05:09,270 --> 00:05:11,860 And indeed, that kind of matches what we have out front. 99 00:05:11,860 --> 00:05:21,170 So a good guess for advanced guessing, 100 00:05:21,170 --> 00:05:28,770 is that we can look at-- so d over dx of 5x squared minus 1, 101 00:05:28,770 --> 00:05:32,100 quantity, to the 4/3. 102 00:05:32,100 --> 00:05:35,840 So OK, so this derivative we can compute by the chain rule. 103 00:05:35,840 --> 00:05:45,712 So this is 4/3 times 5 x squared minus 1 to the 1/3 times-- OK, 104 00:05:45,712 --> 00:05:47,170 so now I need to do the chain rule, 105 00:05:47,170 --> 00:05:49,110 I need to take the derivative of the inside. 106 00:05:49,110 --> 00:05:52,220 Well that's-- OK, so the minus 1 gets killed by the derivative, 107 00:05:52,220 --> 00:05:57,020 so 5 x squared, that becomes 10x. 108 00:05:57,020 --> 00:06:05,790 So I can rewrite this as 40x over 3 times 5 x 109 00:06:05,790 --> 00:06:09,960 squared minus 1 to the 1/3. 110 00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:12,250 So this looks very much like the thing 111 00:06:12,250 --> 00:06:13,846 that we were interested in. 112 00:06:13,846 --> 00:06:13,862 Right? 113 00:06:13,862 --> 00:06:13,942 We were where'd it go? 114 00:06:13,942 --> 00:06:14,566 Oh, here it is. 115 00:06:14,566 --> 00:06:16,880 116 00:06:16,880 --> 00:06:19,340 And the thing we were trying to antidifferentiate. 117 00:06:19,340 --> 00:06:22,960 So the difference is just this constant out front 118 00:06:22,960 --> 00:06:24,170 is a little bit different. 119 00:06:24,170 --> 00:06:28,480 So here I have 4, whereas when I took this derivative 120 00:06:28,480 --> 00:06:29,820 I had 40/3. 121 00:06:29,820 --> 00:06:31,910 So I need to correct for that. 122 00:06:31,910 --> 00:06:33,360 And the correction is just to say, 123 00:06:33,360 --> 00:06:37,140 instead of starting with this 5x squared minus 1 to the 4/3, 124 00:06:37,140 --> 00:06:38,840 I need to start with some multiple of it 125 00:06:38,840 --> 00:06:42,060 to make the constant work out right in the end. 126 00:06:42,060 --> 00:06:45,470 So in this case I was off by a multiple of 10/3, 127 00:06:45,470 --> 00:06:49,870 so I need to correct by multiplying through by 3/10. 128 00:06:49,870 --> 00:06:53,200 So we get that the antiderivative that we want. 129 00:06:53,200 --> 00:07:00,970 The antiderivative of 4x times the quantity 5 x squared 130 00:07:00,970 --> 00:07:07,460 minus 1 to the 1/3 dx is equal to, 131 00:07:07,460 --> 00:07:12,880 well it's equal to 3/10 of this. 132 00:07:12,880 --> 00:07:18,910 5x squared minus 1 to the 4/3. 133 00:07:18,910 --> 00:07:21,660 OK, so that's our second antiderivative, which 134 00:07:21,660 --> 00:07:23,627 we got by advanced guessing. 135 00:07:23,627 --> 00:07:24,960 Now let's look at the third one. 136 00:07:24,960 --> 00:07:27,250 So the third one is tan x. 137 00:07:27,250 --> 00:07:29,870 Now I sort of promised you by asking this question 138 00:07:29,870 --> 00:07:33,770 in this section on substitution that there's, you know, 139 00:07:33,770 --> 00:07:35,410 some substitution you can make. 140 00:07:35,410 --> 00:07:37,520 But it's not sort of obvious just 141 00:07:37,520 --> 00:07:40,700 from looking at tan x what should be substituted where. 142 00:07:40,700 --> 00:07:43,310 At least it isn't obvious to me. 143 00:07:43,310 --> 00:07:45,054 But one thing that can help often 144 00:07:45,054 --> 00:07:46,970 when you don't immediately see a substitution, 145 00:07:46,970 --> 00:07:50,100 is to try rewriting things in equivalent ways. 146 00:07:50,100 --> 00:07:51,760 So sometimes you can do some algebra 147 00:07:51,760 --> 00:07:53,220 or some other manipulation. 148 00:07:53,220 --> 00:07:55,954 In this case there's a very simple sort of rewriting 149 00:07:55,954 --> 00:07:56,620 that you can do. 150 00:07:56,620 --> 00:07:59,000 Which is that tangent of x can be expressed in terms 151 00:07:59,000 --> 00:08:00,520 of sine and cosine of x. 152 00:08:00,520 --> 00:08:05,145 So we can rewrite the antiderivative of tan 153 00:08:05,145 --> 00:08:18,090 x dx as integral sine x over cosine x dx. 154 00:08:18,090 --> 00:08:21,170 OK, so now what do we see? 155 00:08:21,170 --> 00:08:26,690 So, I see in the denominator a cosine of x. 156 00:08:26,690 --> 00:08:30,610 And then up top I have a sine x dx. 157 00:08:30,610 --> 00:08:35,890 So sine x dx, that's really close to the differential 158 00:08:35,890 --> 00:08:38,310 of cosine of x. 159 00:08:38,310 --> 00:08:40,990 So I'm going to try this substitution. 160 00:08:40,990 --> 00:08:46,310 And I'm going to try the substitution u equals cosine x. 161 00:08:46,310 --> 00:08:49,160 So if I make the substitution I get 162 00:08:49,160 --> 00:08:55,900 du is equal to minus sine x dx. 163 00:08:55,900 --> 00:08:58,600 Which is, OK, so now if I plug these values 164 00:08:58,600 --> 00:09:06,410 in with this substitution, this integral becomes the integral, 165 00:09:06,410 --> 00:09:14,190 well it's minus 1 or minus du over u. 166 00:09:14,190 --> 00:09:20,140 That's a nice simple antiderivative to have. 167 00:09:20,140 --> 00:09:21,590 So we've seen this before. 168 00:09:21,590 --> 00:09:23,910 So this is just a logarithm. 169 00:09:23,910 --> 00:09:26,430 So the minus sine comes out front. 170 00:09:26,430 --> 00:09:30,425 So this is minus ln of the absolute value 171 00:09:30,425 --> 00:09:32,490 of u plus a constant. 172 00:09:32,490 --> 00:09:35,510 And now we had this, that u was cosine of x. 173 00:09:35,510 --> 00:09:39,210 So this is minus ln of the absolute value 174 00:09:39,210 --> 00:09:42,910 of cosine of x plus a constant. 175 00:09:42,910 --> 00:09:44,780 Now this should look a little bit familiar. 176 00:09:44,780 --> 00:09:46,510 Because in one of Christine's recitations 177 00:09:46,510 --> 00:09:50,350 earlier, she had you compute the derivative of ln of cosine x. 178 00:09:50,350 --> 00:09:52,670 And in that case you saw that that derivative was 179 00:09:52,670 --> 00:09:54,360 equal to minus tangent of x. 180 00:09:54,360 --> 00:09:57,520 Just like it should be. 181 00:09:57,520 --> 00:09:59,150 So, all right, so there we go. 182 00:09:59,150 --> 00:10:03,410 That was three examples of antidifferentiation 183 00:10:03,410 --> 00:10:06,070 by substitution and advanced guessing. 184 00:10:06,070 --> 00:10:07,575 So I'll leave you with that. 185 00:10:07,575 --> 00:10:08,075